Publication Date
2014-05-05
Availability
Open access
Embargo Period
2014-05-05
Degree Type
Dissertation
Degree Name
Doctor of Philosophy (PHD)
Department
Philosophy (Arts and Sciences)
Date of Defense
2014-03-31
First Committee Member
Edward Erwin
Second Committee Member
Elijah Chudnoff
Third Committee Member
Harvey Siegel
Fourth Committee Member
Otavio Bueno
Abstract
The theory of moral intuition advanced and defended here is based on the largely unexplored possibility of combining: a) the idea that moral intuitions are justified on the basis of distinctive non-doxastic seemings (i.e., perceptualism) and b) the claim that a non-doxastic state also makes you aware of facts that are accessible in other ways through empirical observation and theorizing. Thus, the perceptualist is able to point to the phenomenology of intuition experience as important not along epistemic dimensions, but which have significant explanatory advantages over competing skeptical and non-skeptical approaches to moral knowledge and justification.
Keywords
Intuitionism; Meta-ethics; Experimental Philosophy; W.D. Ross; Ethical Intuitionism
Recommended Citation
Alphonse, Noel E., "Recent Critiques and Defenses of Ethical Intuitionism" (2014). Open Access Dissertations. 1201.
http://scholarlyrepository.miami.edu/oa_dissertations/1201