Publication Date

2015-07-02

Availability

Embargoed

Embargo Period

2017-07-01

Degree Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (PHD)

Department

Accounting (Business)

Date of Defense

2015-04-27

First Committee Member

Andrew J. Leone

Second Committee Member

Peter D. Wysocki

Third Committee Member

Miguel Minutti-Meza

Fourth Committee Member

Dhananjay Nanda

Fifth Committee Member

Yongtao Guan

Abstract

This paper provides evidence on the determinants and career consequences of managers’ strategic causal explanations (attributions) for firm performance. Using new textual analysis algorithms, I identify abnormal attributions and find that managers appear to strategically attribute favorable firm performance to internal factors and poor firm performance to external factors. More importantly, I find that strategic external attributions of poor performance are associated with lower CEO cash-compensation sensitivity and forced turnover likelihood. These findings suggest that managers’ career-related incentives affect their disclosure choices. I also find that abnormal attributions are mitigated by greater analyst following, better corporate governance and greater peer performance commonality. Overall, the evidence is consistent with managers strategically presenting causal explanations to extract private benefits.

Keywords

Career benefits; causal explanation; financial performance; narrative disclosure

Download

Share

COinS