Publication Date
2016-04-22
Availability
Embargoed
Embargo Period
2018-04-22
Degree Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts (MA)
Department
Sociology (Arts and Sciences)
Date of Defense
2016-03-24
First Committee Member
Marisa Omori
Second Committee Member
Amie L. Nielsen
Third Committee Member
Justin Stoler
Abstract
Since the widespread growth of proactive policing strategies across the United States during the 1990s, community members and scholars alike have critiqued these law enforcement techniques for their injurious effects on minority communities. Prior research has established that suspect and neighborhood characteristics influence police decision making and stop outcomes, with Blacks and Latinos faring worse than their White counterparts. What remains largely unknown, however, are the underlying mechanisms driving these disparities. This study approaches the problem by conducting a neighborhood-level analysis of the reasons that police officers provided for making 4.5 million stops over a period of twelve years as a part of the New York City Police Department’s stop and frisk policy. Specifically, this analysis examines how the proportions of stops that are made based on appearance varies depending on neighborhood racial and ethnic composition and perceived crime rates. The results indicate that nonbehavioral stop rates are significantly higher in Black and Latino neighborhoods, and that perceived crime is one of the strongest predictors of the proportion of stops in a neighborhood that are made for nonbehavioral reasons. The findings of this study advance the literature on policing by providing evidence that neighborhood characteristics are salient factors in determining policing practices.
Keywords
Stop and frisk; Policing; Neighborhoods
Recommended Citation
Lautenschlager, Rachel E., "Proactive or Predetermined?: Contextualizing Color-Blind Policing Practices in New York City" (2016). Open Access Theses. 600.
http://scholarlyrepository.miami.edu/oa_theses/600