Off-campus University of Miami users: To download campus access theses, please use the following link to log into our proxy server with your University of Miami CaneID and Password.
Non-University of Miami users: Please talk to your librarian about requesting this thesis through interlibrary loan.
UM campus only
Master of Arts (MA)
Communication Studies (Communication)
Date of Defense
First Committee Member
Dr. Michel Dupagne - Committee Chair
Second Committee Member
Dr. Sallie Hughes - Committee Member
Third Committee Member
Dr. Robert Hosmon - Committee Member
This framing analysis used content analysis to show how a newspaper with a more liberal slant, The Age, and a newspaper with a more conservative slant, The Australian, used frames, sources, and valence in their news and opinion coverage of a very complex scientific and political issue ? climate change. The sample included 1,019 news and opinion articles from 1997 through 2007 in The Australian and The Age. The study revealed that the controversy over climate change was still prevalent in two Australian newspapers. Results showed that The Australian and The Age displayed different prominent frames, sources, and valence in their climate change coverage. Overall, The Australian was more critical and uncertain about climate change, while The Age aimed to educate its readers about the background of the issue and inspire action.
The Age; Newspaper; Editorial Slant; The Australian; Media Slant; Framing; Australia; Global Warming; Climate Change
Nolan, Jamie Melissa, "Consensus and Controversy: Climate Change Frames in Two Australian Newspapers" (2010). Open Access Theses. 30.